Example
FW6 — Anti-Box-Ticking Check
How FW6 catches mechanical model-filling. This is one short exchange; real sessions continue interactively, responding to what you actually write.
Example
How FW6 catches mechanical model-filling. This is one short exchange; real sessions continue interactively, responding to what you actually write.
Paste a reflection where you've filled in a model's headings but it feels mechanical.
Description: it happened. Feelings: I felt fine. Evaluation: it was okay. Analysis: it went okay because I did my best.
You've spotted it yourself — the headings are present but each one is a placeholder. “Analysis: it went okay because I did my best” restates the evaluation rather than explaining anything.
The model isn't the problem; the boxes just haven't been used to think yet. Try this: pick the single heading where you have the most to say honestly, and write three real sentences under it. We'll get one box genuinely working before worrying about the rest.
The tutor questions, diagnoses and teaches, but never writes your experience, feelings, insight or learning. That boundary is the whole point.